The types of individuals one might consider for managing different data classifications is captured in the diagram below. In terms of the sovereign cloud framework, we are highlighting that data guardians should be aware that certain tiers of data should ideally only be managed by certain types of individuals. Child S (sensitive), on the other hand, needs specialist handling by trained individuals and there could be quite negative consequences if Child S is exposed to people lacking the relevant training and awareness of Child S’s specific needs. There is little in the way of regulation governing that access and little could result from diverse types of people interacting with Child NS. In terms of the sovereign cloud framework this equates to a relative lack of concern from data guardians about who has access to the non-sensitive data represented by Child NS. Child NS (not sensitive) is quite capable of being put in a group with other children and left to enjoy most activities with minimal supervision by individuals with minimal training and specialist experience. In the context of the analogy this is looking at the types of people that have access to the children and what that means for the children’s experiences, enjoyment, and safety while on holiday. The first of these assessment criteria applied to the accommodation choices is ‘ people’. In my first blog, I talked about how selecting a sovereign cloud is not just aligned to a technology stack or a solution offering but is more about proposing a framework of assessment that people responsible for safeguarding corporate or public data, (data guardians), can use to evaluate whether a specific sovereign cloud offering is right for them. The Family Holiday – The Assessment CriteriaĪlex Tanner, Senior Staff Cloud Solutions Architect, VMware Partner Connect Cloud Provider partners, UK&I
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |